[ ARC forum 2 ]

Re: In AJ's defence

Written by chImp at 09 May 2003 00:12:25:

As an answer to: Re: In AJ's defence written by AJ at 08 May 2003 19:20:14:

I'm talking from my personal experience. My GP didn't mension stretching as an option to me. Your ones didn'tmension it to you either. It's a perfectly good option. I'm not implying they are circ-hungry, why would they be, this is Europe for fuck's sake. They're just not well enough informed.

>You've been paying way too much heed to the over cautious warning of the anti-circ community. Doctors, for the most part, are not circ hungry as the anti-circ people would have you believe.

I never asked you to "go into detail". A simple yes/no question. Kinda reminds you of something, huh?
>Because it's none of your business, or 28/F's or anyone else's here. What matter is to you what I was doing last night. Would you like me to go into details of what I do and like done? Or howabout the way I like my trouser snake teased when getting a blow job, do you want to know that?

I agree, but it would imply surgery if the person involved didn't go to this site or some similar site first. If your advice was "implanted" in their heads
>I'm not giving advice that implies surgery. I'm giving advice to seek the advice of a medical professional as opposed to the unqualified ramblings of fantatics.

Then why do you regret having it done?
>As I've stated before, it's much better now than before in regards to sensations and enjoyment (what with being pain free and all).

Define "forum". If the definition is "majority of people that hang out here" then that majority wants to know. It's relevant to us and thus to the forum.

Ralesk and Rood did their part. I did mine. Now you do yours and answer simple yes/no question. Don't you mind about Jim who didn't answer the questions. But of course he's your role-model, right?

>I'm certainly not going into any depth with you. Why? Because it's none of your business and not relevant to the topic of this forum.


Answers: