[ ARC forum 2 ]
Written by AJ at 14 May 2003 16:08:27: Re: To be used
As an answer to: To be used written by Paul B. at 14 May 2003 14:56:44:
>>> Really? Who? You? Jim? Ivan? Ralesk? PaulB? Rood? I don't recall any instance of anyone else here giving details about their experiences.
>And the critical point - this immediately demonstrates the specious nature of his entire argument. It is called "selective recall", and goes hand-in-hand with "selective observation" and "selection" of facts.
PaulB, you have a terrible habit of seeing things which are'nt there. An example of this recently was the instance wherein you felt it was suspicious that I posted in the same hour as someone else that does not hold to your views on circumcision. That's paranoia, man. It a similar thing in this instance too. You are seeing things which are not there. It's not "selective recall", it's just a case that I honestly don't recall seeing anything about anyone's sexual experience here (as stated to 28/F who wanted to know about my sexual experience in this thread). I do find it odd how so many of the anti-circ community can take 1 and 1 add them together and come up with 3. Rood does it, 28/F does, Jim does and now you. What's more scary is you are prepared to use this 1+1=3 logic to presume it leads to "selective observation" and "selection of facts" and suggest it as given. I know you anti-circ guys are not stupid, you are just overly passionate about this subject. I can't, however, understand how that same passion makes you take bizarre leaps of speculation and logic and present them as facts or more accurately - lies. If you take a step back and look at your post logically that which you are currently seeing as a "critical" point is in fact just a lie that you have arrogantly fabricated for whatever reason. It's this kind of behaviour that really does screw up this board.
Thanks.