[ ARC forum 2 ]
Written by AJ at 16 May 2003 00:04:27: Good post, Chimp...
As an answer to: Re: Russia Case 2 written by chImp at 15 May 2003 21:57:56:
>To put it short: what if the drive behind some circ-hungry people is not a perversion,
The label of pervision and circ-fetish is thrown around by many in the anti-circ community without regard for truth of context. I myself have been inaccurately labelled with these slurs. While it is true that some people might actually get off on the idea of being circumcised, I would suggest they are in the vast minority and perhaps neighbours in bizarrenss to people that like to cut each other drink each others blood (man, there's some wierd people out there!) I think the problem rests with people like Rood or 28/F when they whimsically suggest someone has a circum-fetish or gets a sexual response based soley on the fact that an adult has willingly been circumcised (regardless if the reason be medical, cosmetic, religous). It's that disregard for context which kind of screws up the perspective others have of the AC community.
>but a rather quite natural quality that evolution gave us humans?
It's human determination which motivates circumcision. Reasons could be medical, ritual or even cosmetic. From that, rightly or wrongly, it ain't evolution, baby!
- Re: Good post, Chimp... Anonymous 5/16/2003 02:53 (28)
- Anon... AJ 5/16/2003 23:24 (27)
- Re: Anon... Anonymous 5/17/2003 03:43 (26)
- Re: Anon... chImp 5/17/2003 05:12 (25)
- Word of advice Anonymous 5/17/2003 19:03 (16)
- Virus Myth chImp 5/17/2003 20:13 (14)
- Re: Virus Myth Ralesk 5/17/2003 20:42 (13)
- Re: Virus Myth chImp 5/17/2003 22:23 (12)
- Rævhøl. Ralesk 5/18/2003 03:38 (6)
- Re: Asshole chImp 5/18/2003 15:39 (3)
- chImp-logic Ralesk 5/18/2003 18:20 (1)
- Re: chImp-logic dave 5/18/2003 19:06 (0)
- Re: Asshole Anonymous 5/18/2003 16:20 (0)
- Ral, that's really unfair! Ivan 5/18/2003 05:48 (1)
- Re: Ral, that's really unfair! Ralesk 5/18/2003 06:14 (0)
- Chimp... AJ 5/17/2003 23:22 (4)
- Re: Chimp... chImp 5/18/2003 02:26 (0)
- Re: Chimp... Anonymous 5/17/2003 23:35 (2)
- Re: Chimp... Ralesk 5/18/2003 03:41 (1)
- Re: Chimp... Anonymous 5/18/2003 16:38 (0)
- Who? AJ 5/17/2003 19:36 (0)
- Re: Anon... AJ 5/17/2003 14:21 (7)
- A touch of truth ... Paul B. 5/17/2003 16:25 (6)