[ ARC forum 2 ]
Written by Anonymous at 11 Jun 2003 17:40:01: Re: AJ's paradox
As an answer to: AJ's paradox written by chImp at 11 Jun 2003 17:24:25:
>I've been wanting to post this for a long time, but did't have the time and kept forgetting.
>AJ's paradox is an interesting psychological observation about AJ, that might lead to an interesting conclusion
>1) Curing phimosis by stretching is fully POSSIBLE (proven by me and Jake Booth) and there is no reason why AJ's penis should be in any way different than mine/Jake Booths
>2) AJ found out he has phimosis and that the cure is circumcision
>3) Clearly, AJ didn't WANT a circumcision, why else would he search all over the Internet to discover that it's POSSIBLE to cure it with simple stretching exercises. Also, he tried to minimize the "damage" by getting a "partial" circ.
>4) Point 3 leads to believe that AJ concideres/concidered circumcision as a bad alternative, and labelling him as a proCIRC-fetishist is wrong.
>5) Point 3 also leads to the conclusion that being an intact male WITHOUT phimosis was the most DESIRED result for AJ.
>6) Point 5 and 1 lead to the conclusion that AJ missed this desired result while being perfectly able to achieve it.
>7) Basically, AJ screwed up and he knows it!Conclusion: AJ is a royal fuckup, the laughing stock of merry old England. LOL