[ ARC forum 2 ]

Re: Again...

Written by AJ at 28 Jun 2003 21:00:35:

As an answer to: Re: Again... written by Larry from Oklahoma City at 28 Jun 2003 19:33:26:

>Cowboy, you have some serious issues don't you.

No, not really. You, however, seem to have a little pent up hostility, "Cowboy"! Odd how you have drawn that conclusion based on nothing - Larry-Logic, perhaps?

>To start out, those guys you mentioned haven't made the claims you have.

Which claims are you referring to. I was referring to the hypocrisy of you not suggesting that they have "sinned" for name-calling. Both of them have said far, far worse than I would ever dream of.

>You started this mess and now that your deep in the middle you call a foul.

Really? How? Oh, and there's a mess?

>Remember that website you made to discredit people? You started with that gal from down under and your favorite hated guy Jim. By mumbojumbo you tried to make what they said into something dirty.

If it is dirty or not is up to the reader to decide. It's just a bunch of quotes with links to the original texts. I do find it strange how you know about that place since I haven't published the address in months. You are not new here at all, are you?


>Now tell us comboy if you think that is a Christian thing to do.

Again with the "cowboy". You do indeed seem a little rattled. Why? Also, you might want to bear in mind that your little name calling reference is lost on me. Cowboys are an American product and have little meaning over here in the UK.

>You just made the claim to be one, so if that's so I would like to know what part of the Bible taught you to do that sort of thing.

I am a Christian. Why does that upset you so?

>Do you guys in the Church of England have a special edition of the Bible that teaches you to badmouth people you don't agree with?

No. That's Jim's edition. Indeed going by his (yours?) actions it is okay to judge and condemn people to Hell - that's awful presumptive, no?

>Now you remember partner that you are the one who started this little topic.

Again cowboy reference - not really working with me. Please, if you feel you must address me, call me AJ.

>When you figure it all out and find out what you did it would be a good idea to apologize to that little gal whose picture you spread all over the web, the 29 yr old,

Aussie Girl - I am sorry for putting the image of you that was given to me on that particular website. I will remove it in the near future and will write you an apology in the hope of mending some fences and perhaps building some bridges.

>your old enemy Jim

Apologise for what specifically? Having a view that doesn't sit well with him?

>and that old country doctor that you think is a kid.

I have nothing to apologise to PaulB for.

>Once you have that all done, then if you want to know what being a Christian is all about we can talk about getting into email.

I posed a question to Jim about his beliefs on the subject. I am not seeking yours. Indeed until this week you did not exist on this forum as "Larry", so why would I care to ask your views? You have never contributed here before, yet you know all the history between the peoples here. I also find it strange that you have exactly the same views and communication problems that Jim has (i.e. patronising, aggressive, belittling name calling - cowboy, partner etc.) I wonder why you feel it necessary to use a different name for this discussion.

Oh, well.


Answers: