[ ARC forum 2 ]
Written by chImp at 05 Jul 2003 04:18:34: Re: Dearest chImp,
As an answer to: Dearest chImp, written by Ralesk at 05 Jul 2003 01:41:39:
My impression is that unless I keep expressing my views HERE, people just won't be interested enough to go to my forum. For instance, of the regulars here only Ivan actually bothered posting a couple of messages on AJ's forum, although it is supposed to be this cool, troll-free forum. Of cource, it doesn't hurt trying either.
>What is your precious problem here? I never told you to shut the hell up about it, I told you to find an /appropriate/ forum and give us a link to it.
Ralesk, I fucking WANT a disturbance. Like I said, this is an important issue.
>I'm not sweeping the issue under a rug, chUmp, I'm sweeping it to another forum where it is not a disturbance to those not interested. There is a difference.
I just confirmed my own suspicions about the regulars on this forum. Whenever I say something abusive, I get lots of responce. Whenever I try to start an interesting debate, I get little or no responce. In either case, it's off-topic, but don't you think debates are better than obscenities?
>Thank you. In that case, don't tell me again to shut the fuck up, okay, hetero-boy?
I tried to initiate a debate on Duesberg's alternative HIV/AIDS theory. I posted some 3 links to must-read material. Ivan admitted to not having bothered reading them. He said "oh good, since you post summaries of the articles all the time, I don't have to read them in the future either". How is it possible to have a debate about something, where your opponent doesn't bother read what it's all about in the first place?
>That was far nearer to topic than this was. Ivan even replied to you about it and then you never discussed it with him. Interested much?
Thanks for the advice, I'm actually gonna do that.
>If you are really concerned, you could also write an e-mail to your favourite [local] politician. You might even get a reply that's not just a mass-producted auto-answer.
Ralesk, could you please rephrase yourself, I don't understand your complex sentence starting with "There is, however.......". Do you or do you not agree with laws aimed at Holocaust deniars?>There is not much to question the Holocaust. It happened. There is, however, also no place to abuse the past for those who have never been directly affected by it. I could care less about people's skin colour, faith or nationality, until they use any of this against me for nothing that I personally did to them, personally. Hope my point can be seen.
>Cheers,