[ ARC forum 2 ]

Manchester?

Written by AJ at 18 Jul 2003 20:37:13:

As an answer to: The idiot of Manchester speaks again written by Jim at 18 Jul 2003 18:46:52:

What gives you the idea I am from Manchester. Last time you had your cyber-stalking hat on, you tracked me down to living in Norwich - a suburb of London!!! Anyhoo, stop worrying about where I live?

>AJ, what do nudits do that is so terrible compared to a guy who has a useful piece of his body cut off?

I don't much care which either do with their own bodies and in their own time. In that sense there is no difference.

>Cutting off body parts is mutilation no matter how you look at it. So is puncturing, scratching, or any other action which permanently scars the skin. By definition, it can be no other way, not even in your pointed little head.

Okay. So what you are saying is that when a parent takes their little girl to get their ear pierced they should be asking "Can you mutilate my little girls ear please?" Right, Jim. *backs away slowly without making eye contact with the scary man*

>Well, we don't really know if you get horny or not,

Really? In the past yourself and your friends have asked if I am gay, straight, a virgin, and have made assertions that I masturbate over babies and have sex with dogs. You may not know if I'm horny or not, but you certainly express an interest in what gets my motor running. Perverts.


>but your advice always tries to lead others to follow you and what you did.

Not at all. My advice is to get professional help.

> You don't seem terribly content with your status for you continue to hang around trying to justify your actions by getting support from followers.

I'm not justifying my actions. I don't need to. It is you that cannot accept this, Jim. Just as you can't accept a whole lot of things. For example, you threw a spaz about me being a Christian because it didn't fit into your framework. That's sad.

>If you had put only a tiny fraction of your wasted energy of attempted justification into skin expansion by continuing to stretch your skin, you would have finished the job two years ago, and you wouldn't have had to undergo the biggest event in your life.

Just because you being circumcised was the biggest even in your life, Jim, it does not make it so for me.

>Oh, AJ, there is no such thing as a partial. Once the circle is complete, the job is also. If you don't believe it, get out your Webster's again and look up the meaning of the prefix. It means around in Latin, and that is not circumlocution.

Jim, your need to play on words demonstrates how desperate you are. A partial circumcision is a procedure that medical bodies refer to when removing a smaller amount of foreskin than that of which is removed during a full circumcision, or some such. Perhaps you could take up your tardy arguement with all the surgeons and consultants that you hate so much and not with me.



Answers: