Re: typical frenular confusion

Written by Steve on 26. August 1999 at 00:35:35:

In Reply to: Re: typical frenular confusion written by RS on 25. August 1999 at 14:23:03:

>Hi Steve

>The only form of phimosis which you need worry about is a phimotic ring, aparrently from your descriptions you have none. What I suspect is that your frenulum is of the type which branches out like the roots of a tree, and your tree roots are too short, and this is causing the narrowed opening ... you need pruning ...

>I believe what you describe is what you see always: the effect of the foreskin which wont retract, - I`m pretty sure the cause of this is the frenulum,

>Your descriptions are too vague for me to be 100% sure that you haven`t any trace of phimosis, ... but if underneath the glans, the outer foreskin is connected right up front to the glans then this is something clearly not normal, and I still hold to my advice that the frenulum is the main problem and if you get this fixed then you`ll be able to see if you`ve any phimosis.


When my penis is limp my foreskin over hangs the end of my penis by about 1cm and it seriously smaller than the rest of my penis - I can't even stretch the end of it anywhere near as wide as the rest of my penis

>have you read and do you understand
>https://www.male-initiation.net/frenulum_breve.html
>https://www.male-initiation.net/phimosis.html

I have read them but I still can't relate them to my penis exactly - the neares thing it sounds like is the infant phoimosis and certainly my penis has always looked like it does now (well its bigger - but the tubular form has always been there)

>You said you wouldn`t mind going private, hummm well Dr. Cuckow in London must be the expert but we`re talking about &1,200 for an op. or &125 for a consultation, now what I`m thinking is it might be worth a consultation for you to get my diagnosis confirmed, ... (or naturally rejected?)

*gulps*

>I can guarantee with a partial circ. your problem would still remain, maybe on the other hand you`d like a partial circ. but that is purely a cosmetic question ...

The first of the two pages you refer to talks about a frenuloplasty - which I assume would resolve the frenulum breve but not the phimosis (if I do indeed have it). Is it possible to combine a frenuloplasty with a partial circ or are they mutually exclusive?


>Robin


If there are mor details you would like to know then please feel free to email me

Steve

Answers:

ARC forum main index
forum1 index
page1 /page2

The Origins of a Taboo